IEEE
Region
3 Student Paper Contest Information
The annual Student Paper competition is held annually at SoutheastCon.
1.
Timetable
March
1:
The entrants must e-mail a PDF version of
their papers to the Regional Student Activities Chair (RSAC), Dr. Eric S. Ackerman e.ackerman@ieee.org, no later than this
date.
Please use the subject line:
2009 IEEE R3 Paper Contest Entry Attached
in the header of the
e-mail and give complete contact information for both the student and the
student branch counselor.
March
15: Judging of written papers is to
be completed by this date. Contestants whose papers
are selected to be presented orally will be notified
immediately thereafter by the host Counselor or the
Regional Student Activities Chair acting for the host
Counselor. In order to ensure prompt notification,
please include the branch counselor's telephone number
in the letter of transmittal.
Conference
Time: Finalists selected must be at
SoutheastCon to present their papers.
2.
Eligibility
To
be eligible to enter a paper in the competition, the
author must be a paid-up student member of IEEE in Region
3 at the time that the entry is submitted. The student
must also be an undergraduate the Spring term of the
year the paper is presented. Multiple authors are permitted
up to a limit of three, all of whom must be undergraduate
students and IEEE student members.
Any questions regarding eligibility or deviation from
prescribed procedures will be decided upon by the
members of the judging team present at the competition.
3.
Prizes
The
Institute Life Member Fund provides funds to the Region
for prizes as follows:
First
Place - $800.00
Second
Place - $500.00
Third
Place - $200.00
In addition to the first, second, and third place
prizes, the school represented by the Author of the
first place paper will receive a plaque.
4.
Written Presentation
The
following is a list of the major parts of a suitable
paper. It is intended only as a basic guide in establishing
the format.
Cover
page (use the format described in Section
10). The cover page, which contains the author(s)
name(s) and the Student Branch affiliation, will
be removed before the paper is transmitted to the
judges.
- Title
page (names of persons or schools should not appear
on this page - see Section
11).
- Abstract
(not more than one page)
- Introduction
- Body
of paper
- Conclusions
and Recommendations
- Appendices
- References/Bibliography
The paper should be typewritten, double-spaced, no
smaller than 10 point font on one side of 8-1/2"
x 11" paper. Legible photocopies are acceptable.
The pages of the paper must be numbered consecutively.
The Introduction, Body, Conclusions, Tables, and Diagrams
together may not exceed 15 pages while these sections
together with the Appendices may not exceed 20 pages.
Judges will penalize those who exceed this length.
Each copy of the paper submitted for judging must
be securely fastened in a suitable folder.
Contestants are strongly encouraged to bring additional
copies for distribution at the time of the oral presentation.
These additional copies need not be in folders.
5.
Oral Presentation
The 10 to 12 highest scoring papers in the written
judging will be selected by the RSAC for oral presentation.
Each contestant will have 15 minutes for oral presentation
and 5 minutes for a question and answer period. A
timekeeper will indicate, by some suitable method,
how a contestant's time is progressing and when each
of his/her prescribed time periods is completed.
The RSAC will use a random process to determine the
order of oral presentation and will endeavor to inform
the participating schools of their presentation order
prior to the conference.
6.
Judges
The
basis for the judging is indicated in the following
sections. The winners shall be determined from the sum
of written and oral scores.
7.
Written
There
will be three judges of the written papers. They will judge each of the papers
independently and send their scores to the RSAC.
8.
Oral
Three
judges of the oral presentations and a timekeeper will be selected
by the Host Counselor.
9.
Scoring
WRITTEN PRESENTATION (maximum possible score:
56 points) |
Originality
1. Originality should be interpreted to give
credit for results, investigative procedure,
and conclusions that are primarily those of
the author. A general guidance from the literature
is acceptable.
2. Originality can be evidenced by an unusual,
imaginative, or concise treatment of the subject.
Both (1) and (2) should be present to a reasonable
degree to receive full credit. |
12
points
|
Analytical Treatment
The fundamental nature of the subject should
be clearly revealed, and the component parts
of the topic should be carefully related to
yield a unified analysis. |
16
points
|
Interest
The paper should be of general engineering
or computer science interest and a sound engineering
reason for considering the subject should
be present. |
12
points
|
Mode of Expression |
|
1. Logical organization of material and clarity
of presentation |
4
points
|
2. Concise and coherent expression of thoughts
|
4
points
|
3. Effective and judicial use of electrical
theory |
4
points
|
4. Adequate introduction and closure. The introduction
should properly orient the reader for the main
body of the material. The closure should include
a summary of the writer's contributions, forecast,
or conclusions. |
4
points
|
ORAL PRESENTATION (maximum possible score: 44
points) |
Speaking Techniques
The contestant should be clear and easy to
understand. |
12
points
|
Style
Presentation of material should follow a logical
course and should stimulate the thinking of
the audience. |
12
points
|
Introduction and Conclusion
Presentation should begin with a proper introduction.
Background of the problem should be made clear
before proceeding to the main body of the
presentation. Conclusions should be briefly
summarized. |
5
points
|
Technical Presentation
The speaker should exhibit a clear understanding
of the topic, of the important related literature,
and of the associated electrical theory. The
presentation should be technically sound,
and the fundamental nature of the subject
should be clearly described. |
10
points
|
Discussion
The speaker should display a reasonable knowledge
of the subject by answering the questions
adequately. |
5
points
|
Name and Mailing Address of School
TITLE OF PAPER
Student's Name
Student IEEE Membership Number
Submitted for consideration in
Region 3, IEEE
Student Paper Competition
Endorsement
of Branch Counselor
The author(s) of this paper are student members of this IEEE student branch and will
still be undergraduate students at the time of SoutheastCon. This paper is the only
entry of our student branch.
Signature: _____________________________________________________
Name (Typed): __________________________________________________
Telephone Number of Counselor: (____) __________________________
TITLE OF PAPER
ABSTRACT
Give
the abstract . . .
Start paper . . .