Voice Stress
Analysis Stirs Controversy & Debate
BY STEPHEN COX
In an announcement in the British parliament in
April 2007, the Work and Pensions Secretary, John Hutton, said that "voice-risk
analysis software" would be trialed by Harrow Council, in north London, from
May, for the purpose of detecting fraudulent housing benefit and council tax
benefit claims. "Voice risk analysis software" is another name for "voice stress
analysis" (VSA), a technology that has been marketed by several companies since
the 1970s. It is based on the proposition that "telling a significant lie will
produce some degree of psychological stress" [1], and detecting the presence of
stress in the voice. There has been a certain amount of research on the
detection of stress in speech, and it appears it can be done - for instance, one
study showed that conversational and read speech of 31 male speakers in neutral
and stressed states could be distinguished with 88% accuracy [2], and a 2002
evaluation report by the US Department of Justice of two VSA systems said in its
conclusion that "... it could be stated that these two VSA units do recognize
stress." [3].
However, crucially, the same report went on to
say: "Although these systems state they detect deception, this was not proven."
[3]. This point is taken up by Aldert Vrij, professor of social psychology at
the University of Portsmouth, UK: "It [VSA] is not measuring lying; it's
measuring stress. The assumption is that liars are more stressed than
truth-tellers and that's not always the case. A skilled liar will not be
stressed." [4]. And the converse also holds: many people making legitimate
claims will be subject to stress, especially if they know that VSA is being used
to analyze their voice. A more recent evaluation of VSA [5] showed that
commercial VSA systems fared better than chance at detecting deception in
recordings where "ground truth" was known, but only just: the overall accuracy
was 63% in 516 tests, and the number of false positives was 23%. In these tests,
the VSA systems only provided data, and the deception/non-deception decision was
made by analysts with years of training - it seems unlikely that Harrow council,
or the several other UK councils and insurance companies that are beginning to
trial VSA, would be employing such personnel.
More disturbing is the case of Michael Crowe of
Escondido, Calif., whose 12-year-old sister, Stephanie, was found stabbed to
death in her bedroom. He was given a VSA test which he was told he had "failed".
He then began to doubt his own memory and wonder whether he might have killed
his sister. "I didn't want to go to prison, and I just wanted to be out of that
room," Crowe recalled. "So my only option was to say, 'Yeah, I guess I did it,'
and then hope for the best." However, a week before the start of his trial, the
police found DNA evidence that led to the real killer, who is now in prison for
killing Crowe's sister [6]. In the aftermath of this case, an expert who
testified stated that VSA was used routinely as a scare tactic to elicit
confessions.
Some bloggers have termed VSA junk-science, but
this is incorrect: it is a classical example of decent scientific research that
is being misapplied, perhaps unintentionally, with potentially devastating
consequences for individuals. As professionals working in this area, the best we
can do is to emphasize that VSA is just that; stress analysis, and stress does
not equate to deception. Or alternatively, campaign to have all statements made
by politicians subject to VSA: that would soon see its withdrawal.
[I] Allan Bell Enterprises, Comparisons of
Existing Lie-Detection Equipment, Unpublished.
[2] M. Sigmund and T. Dostal, Detection of
psychological stress by analysing of glottal pulse waveform, Artificial
Intelligence and Applications, 2007, pp 561-566.
[3] D. Haddad, et. al, Investigation and
Evaluation of Voice Stress Analysis Technology. Final Report for National
Institute of Justice, Interagency Agreement 98- LB-R-013. Washington, DC, 2002.
NCJRS, NCJ 193832. Available at https://antipolygraph.org/documents/193832.pdf
[4]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,2171410,00.html
[5] C.S. Hopkins, R.J. Ratley, D.S.
Benincasa and J.J. Grieco Evaluation of Voice Stress Analysis Technology
Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System
Sciences, 2005.
[6]
http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/Story?id=1786421&page=1